

Two dashboards, two different turnover figures. Which one is correct?
The problem is by no means always with the data itself. It is often unclear who is responsible for the definition, quality and application of a data product. Particularly when data from different sources and systems is brought together, that responsibility can quickly become spread across several teams.
A Data Product Owner brings clarity to this situation. This person oversees the data product from source to use and ensures that business and technical teams work on the basis of the same definitions and principles.
But what exactly does data product ownership entail? What is a Data Product Owner responsible for? And how do you organise this without adding an extra layer of processes and consultation to your organisation?

Data plays a key role in virtually every organisation. However, raw data alone does not provide any useful insights. Value is created when data is processed into information that people can actually use to drive decision-making.
Think, for example, of KPIs such as turnover, EBITDA or churn, but also of datasets and reports used to manage processes.
A data product is a dataset, KPI, report or other data solution that is developed and managed to support a specific user need. Such a product is not usually created in one place. Data is sourced from various sources, transformed and combined with business definitions before the final result becomes available.
This makes the path from data source to insight broad and dynamic. Technical data sources change, but business processes and definitions also evolve over time.
So who maintains an overview of the whole picture?
Without clear ownership, there is a risk that individual teams will only take responsibility for their own part. For example, a technical team ensures that a pipeline works, whilst the business determines how a KPI is defined. For a reliable data product, these worlds must come together.
Imagine: the data team has implemented a new calculation for turnover in the data warehouse. The new calculation takes better account of the different definitions of business units and therefore provides a more up-to-date picture of reality.
However, elsewhere in the organisation, an old definition is still being used. Those figures then end up in a strategic meeting.
The result: two different turnover figures.
Not because the underlying data is inherently incorrect, but because different parts of the organisation are not working with the same definition or version. This then leads to precisely the discussion you want to avoid: which figure is correct?
This has wider implications than a mere debate about a dashboard. Unclear ownership can lead to:
The problem is not just technical. There is no one who is responsible for the data product as a whole: someone who knows where the data comes from, which definitions are used, who uses the product and what happens when something changes anywhere along the data journey.
A Data Product Owner (DPO) is responsible for the value, quality and usability of a data product throughout its lifecycle. The Data Product Owner thus acts as the link between the business and the technical teams that build and maintain the data product.
The DPO does not need to build every data source or transformation themselves. Their responsibility lies, rather, in overseeing the whole.
Key questions in this regard include, for example:
By designating a single, clear point of contact, you prevent responsibility from being passed back and forth between different teams. This makes the Data Product Owner a key component of data governance: the framework through which you organise, amongst other things, responsibilities, definitions and quality standards relating to data.
Ownership does not mean that one person has to carry out all the work relating to a data product.
For example, a Data Product Owner does not have to build every data pipeline themselves, resolve every technical incident or own all the systems in which source data is generated. Nor does the DPO have to make all decisions independently.
The role is about coordination.
Technical specialists remain responsible for building and maintaining the technical solution. Business stakeholders contribute their knowledge of processes and definitions. The Data Product Owner ensures that these elements come together and that it is clear who bears which responsibility.
Responsibility thus creates not only value, but also trust.
Introducing data product ownership is not just a technical change. It is primarily an organisational issue.
The technology must provide sufficient insight into the journey that data takes through the organisation. However, a complete overview of data sources and transformations is of little value if it remains unclear who is authorised to make decisions.
Therefore, do not start by appointing a Data Product Owner for every conceivable data product. Start with the products that your organisation actually needs to be able to rely on.

Which KPIs are used to inform strategic decisions? Which datasets drive key processes? And which reports are used on a daily basis by multiple teams? By first identifying the most important data products, you can prevent data product ownership from immediately becoming a large-scale governance project.
Next, identify who has ultimate responsibility for the data product. That person must have sufficient knowledge of how the product is used and be given the mandate to bring stakeholders together, set priorities and coordinate changes. Simply designating someone as the ‘owner’ is therefore not enough. Ownership only works when it is also clear what responsibilities and decision-making powers are associated with it.
A Data Product Owner must be able to understand how a product is created. Which sources are used? What transformations take place? Which business rules are applied? And where is the end result subsequently used? By providing insight into this data lineage, it also becomes clearer what impact a change earlier in the chain has on users further down the line.
“The data must be good” is not a useful quality standard. You should therefore define what quality actually means for each data product. Consider factors such as timeliness, completeness, reliability and availability. For example, a KPI that is reviewed once a month will have different requirements to data used to continuously drive an operational process.
A data source changes.
A department amends a definition. A technical team implements a new transformation. Who needs to know about this? Set out in advance who should be involved in changes and who decides when a change is to be implemented. This prevents a single technical adjustment from having unexpected consequences for multiple reports, teams or processes.
Effective data product ownership does not end once responsibilities have been set out on paper.
Check regularly whether the product is still being used, meets the agreed quality standards and aligns with users’ needs. Technical KPIs are important here, but ultimately it is the business value that counts. A technically perfect data product that nobody uses is of little value.
Exactly how you organise data product ownership varies from organisation to organisation.
A company with just a few business-critical KPIs requires a different approach to an enterprise organisation with dozens of data teams and hundreds of data products. It is therefore not necessary to set up a comprehensive data governance framework from day one.
The core principle remains the same: make it clear which data products are important, how they are created, and who is responsible for their quality and value.
In this regard, technology and organisation reinforce each other. A scalable data infrastructure enables insight and control. Clear definitions ensure that everyone speaks the same language. And clear ownership ensures that someone takes responsibility when something changes.
In this way, you’re not just building data products. You’re building trust in the information on which your organisation bases its decisions.

Effective data product ownership doesn’t start with a new job title. It starts with clear responsibilities, reliable data and a data platform on which you can organise those responsibilities.
Blenddata helps organisations translate data into practical solutions for the business. Our data engineers contribute ideas on both the design of the data platform and the processes and responsibilities surrounding it.
In this way, we work together to ensure that your organisation not only has data at its disposal, but can also rely on it.